Posts Tagged ‘traffic

13
Mar
12

Guest Editorial: Rhode Island Row’s Pedestrian Issues

by Toni Dach

There is no doubt that the Rhode Island Row development is a huge step forward for our community.  After years of neglect and disinvestment, we are now getting a development that will bring new residents into the neighborhood, make good use of urban space right next to a Metro, and provide the community with the retail we need and desire.  Replacing a wasteful surface parking lot with a dense, mixed-use development is good urban design.  One could squabble about the amount of parking included in the development or the width of the sidewalks (with the planters) or other relatively minor issues but the development was clearly meant to be walkable and transit-oriented.  However, the design and operation of the entrance intersection is anything but walkable – or even drivable.

I cross this intersection on an almost daily basis on foot.  Most days, I feel like this is a fool’s errand.  First of all, the intersection has “on demand only” crosswalk signals, where pedestrians have to push a button and wait for a walk signal, even if they have the light.  I patiently waited three times this week for a walk signal to see how long it would take me to get the two walk signals I need to cross the intersection (wait time only…I timed from when I pushed the crosswalk buttons until I got a walk signal, stopping the clock while I walked across the street and to the next intersection).  It took me 2:58, 2:36, and 1:23 minutes to get a walk signal, in total, and the longest I waited for a single walk signal (to cross only one road) was 1:40 minutes.  This is absolutely unacceptable.  The crosswalks should provide pedestrians with walk signals every time they are crossing with the light.  I also timed the lights, and the longest I would have had to wait for both signals if I got one every time the light changed was 1:13.  Still kind of long, but much better than my average wait, and many times I would have had no wait as I lucked out and hit the lights just right.

In addition to the poor design of the crosswalk signals, the crosswalks are placed in such a location that drivers turning the corners out of the Rhode Island Place shopping center and onto the Rhode Island Row main street aren’t immediately able to see pedestrians in the crosswalks.  Though I’m not sure most drivers care if there are pedestrians in the crosswalks, anyway.  The developers have stationed a flagger with a stop sign at the entrance to the Rhode Island Row main street to help pedestrians cross in the morning.  This flagger is routinely ignored by drivers turning onto the main street, who should be yielding to pedestrians in the crosswalk.  While moving the crosswalks would most likely be an expensive and cumbersome process, placing signs alerting drivers that there’s a crosswalk after their turn, and to yield to pedestrians in those crosswalks, would be inexpensive and go a long way to improving pedestrian safety.  Restriping the crosswalks with highly visible and reflective materials would also improve their visibility and safety.  Finally, the right turn onto the Rhode Island Row main street is supposed to be “no turn on red,” allowing pedestrians to safely cross in front of stopped traffic ultimately going to Rhode Island Row and the Metro.  However, the sign indicating this says “right on {green light image} only,” and is mounted between the lights, far away from drivers.  It’s unclear in its message, incredibly hard to see, and does nothing to keep drivers, including Metro bus drivers, from turning right on red.  This substantially increases the danger of the intersection to pedestrians.

Because of the safety and convenience issues with using the crosswalks, most pedestrians cross the intersection illegally, myself included.  I’ve found that drivers have better sight-lines to see me, and me them, if I cross the Rhode Island Place driveway and Metro/Rhode Island Row exit rather than use the marked crosswalks, and many others obviously feel the same way.  I also don’t have to wait forever for walk signals, just check the lights and look for oncoming traffic.  However, this is dangerous, as evidenced by the multiple times I have started to cross the Rhode Island Row/Metro exit or the Rhode Island Place entrance/exit only to have the light change while I’m in the middle of the street.  So far, drivers have been courteous enough to not run me over, but I shouldn’t have to test their patience and risk my life to safely and expediently cross a street with heavy pedestrian traffic.

But this intersection is not just inconvenient and dangerous for pedestrians, it’s a serious danger for drivers, Metro bus drivers, and Metro bus riders.  Drivers turning left into the Rhode Island Place shopping center routinely make their turns – on a green light, not a green arrow – in front of cars and Metro buses exiting Rhode Island Row and the Metro that have the right of way.  At the same time, drivers exiting the Rhode Island Place shopping center routinely turn right on red without regard for the same drivers and Metro buses exiting Rhode Island Row and the Metro, who still have the right of way.  I got some lovely pictures of the numerous near pile-ups I see on a weekly basis for your enjoyment/horror.  Here again, some signage could vastly improve this situation, altering drivers turning left to yield on a solid green light and drivers exiting Rhode Island Place to yield before right on red.  A turn arrow could also be provided for drivers exiting Rhode Island Place to allow them continuous right turns while the left turn signal into the center from the Rhode Island Avenue entrance is activated.  This would keep traffic moving in a safe and orderly manner.  Finally, drivers make right turns out of the Rhode Island Place center from both the left and right lanes, increasing speeds around the corner, leading to near-collisions as drivers attempt to get in the proper lane to exit onto Rhode Island Avenue, and putting pedestrians crossing legally in even more danger.  Some pavement paint and possibly a sign indicating that the left lane is straight only would go miles to improving this situation.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

I have also seen a handful of drivers entering the development from Rhode Island Avenue continue straight into the Rhode Island Row/Metro one-way exit, the wrong way.  There is a Do Not Enter sign on the light pole at the intersection, but it clearly needs to be more conspicuous, either in its design or location, or both.

I have already contacted DDOT, Chairman Brown, and my ANC (Regina James, who also represents Rhode Island Row) about this issue and received an immediate response from both Chairman Brown’s staff and DDOT.  I thank Chairman Brown’s staff and DDOT staff for their immediate recognition of this issue, but I encourage other members of the community to throw your hat in the ring and inform these same representatives and officials that this intersection needs to be made safer for drivers and pedestrians to truly allow the Rhode Island Row development – and the broader community – to flourish.  It’s easy to ignore one voice, but harder to ignore a whole community’s expressed needs.  The city has a lot on the line with this development, and it would be a shame to see things as simple as traffic signage, pedestrian accommodations, and traffic enforcement seriously hamper its viability.  DDOT’s website indicates that new signage may take 4-6 months to install due to the need to review the signage before its installation, so we may also need to involve whoever our new councilmember is after the spring election in ultimately resolving this issue, as well.

EDITORS NOTE: Thanks to Toni for taking a proactive stance in the community! Help Toni make a difference by sending a message to DDOT and Chairman Brown. Contact info is below:

DDOT, Email: ddot@dc.gov, Phone: (202) 673-6813

Chairman Kwame Brown, Email: cmason@dccouncil.us (Constituent Services), Phone: (202) 724-8032

 

About the author: Toni has lived in the Brentwood community since 2009.  Professionally, she’s a trade analyst for the Department of Commerce. All views expressed in this article are that of Toni Dach’s and does not reflect those of her employer.

About these ads



Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 946 other followers