Comments on: New Rules

By: rhodeislandinsider

rhodeislandinsider — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:49:31 +0000

And I will no longer answer yours. Tit-for-tat.

Good luck getting the Anon poster’s response.

By: rhodeislandinsider

rhodeislandinsider — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:48:30 +0000

Mr. Mends-Cole, glad that you finally posted a comment on this blog. You seem to have missed all other postings about the issues with the Temple/Hall and the issues with the community. What have you done lately to work with the local residents in the area that were affected by your Hall’s unruly patrons and conduct over the past year (for more than the past year, according to most residents in the area).

As to your questions, you can only hope that the Anon poster responds.

By: Tim Westford

Tim Westford — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:45:03 +0000

Upon receiving the facts from your ghost writer … I’ll be sure to answer your query!

Awaiting His/Her response.

By: William Mends-Cole

William Mends-Cole — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:42:20 +0000

I am The Chairman of the Board, I know Bro. Guy Mitchell, and interact with him almost everyday. At no time has he been sick with the swine flu. I preside over every board meeting, therefore I need to know when and where was this meeting.

By: rhodeislandinsider

rhodeislandinsider — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:28:29 +0000

I have emailed the Anon poster to ask him/her to back up their claims.

Also, Tim, what is your relation to the King Solomon’s lodge? Let’s put the cards on the table, and your claim that the post is a direct threat is ridiculous. Please let’s keep this at a certain intelligence level. There is no claim of a direct threat of physical harm to you or anyone else in the post.

By: Tim Westford

Tim Westford — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:25:33 +0000

BTW …I believe that is a direct threat and of a serious nature that requires your attention.

By: Tim Westford

Tim Westford — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:20:09 +0000

What about slandering a person (s) character?

By: rhodeislandinsider

rhodeislandinsider — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:11:58 +0000

Well, Tim, unless the Anon poster responds to you, I am not sure how you would get the answers. It was not my post therefore I cannot speak to the information contained in it. If you have a point to refute on it, post it. The only rules for me rejecting a comment, is the use of profanity and direct threats of a serious nature.

By: Tim Westford

Tim Westford — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 03:09:07 +0000

Just trying to get an understanding ….. I see there was some allegations made of some of the members …. please inform me of what supporting facts do you have? … and where is your information coming from ?Did you ever consider it could be hearsay?

By: rhodeislandinsider

rhodeislandinsider — Tue, 19 Jan 2010 02:55:26 +0000

By the way, if your comment (or your so called “final warning”) is based on the the anonymous comment on this posting, then your fight is elsewhere. What I post, I back up. What others post on the blog, I have no control. It is an open forum.